We can provide free samples . Please contact Email for any inquiries

According to reports, the U.S. Congress Bureau of Investigation (CRS) revised the 1996 report, at the end of last month to publish a new edition of a report entitled "The Diaoyu Islands dispute: U.S. treaty obligations".The report shows that the U.S. government commissioned by Congress to approve the return of Okinawa agreement "signed with Japan in 1972 said:" Diaoyu Islands executive power is transferred to the Japanese claim of sovereignty over the island, does not mean that there is any tendency. "Thatthe United States although the armistice after World War II is responsible for management of the Diaoyu Islands returned to the Japanese government, but for China and Japan claim of sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands "neutral attitude.

For the U.S. Congress "and" the return of Okinawa agreement "will affect the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands," this issue, the United States, he was appointed Secretary of State William Rogers was also replied: "there is no impact on the legal status of these islands (sovereignty).

In addition, the U.S. State Department Acting Legal Counsel Robert ? Starr also said: "The United States can not expand Japan handed over to us (the United States) can not be reduced before it had the Diaoyu Islands have legal rights, and now the return of other claims sovereign state rights. "reports said, suggesting that the United States does not have any impact on the sovereignty dispute, and will keep their distance from the issue.

However, the report also pointed out that: "Although the United States on the issue of sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands are neutral, but the US-Japan Security Treaty applies object does include the Diaoyu Islands." Because of the US-Japan Security Treaty provisions applicable object "Japan has areas of executive power. "